• ISO 9001:2015 Certified
  • Quote response within 24 hours
  • Global bulk supply
Industrial case study

Aerospace & Defence Components Manufacturer

After CNC machining and heat treatment, aerospace aluminium and titanium parts suffered micro-cutting from angular abrasives, non-uniform cosmetic finish, dimensional risk on tight...

View products
ISO 9001:2015 certified supply
Process-matched bead grades
Bulk export & documentation
Proof

Challenge & solution

How industrial glass bead media addressed a real production requirement.

Challenge

After CNC machining and heat treatment, aerospace aluminium and titanium parts suffered micro-cutting from angular abrasives, non-uniform cosmetic finish, dimensional risk on tight tolerances, about 6% surface-related rejections, and audit pressure for a controlled, contamination-free process.

Solution

After application study and controlled field trials, we switched to aerospace-grade spherical glass beads (150–250 microns) with low-pressure peening—cutting finish rejections from 6% to under 0.8%, preserving dimensions, and delivering a uniform matte-to-satin finish for inspection and OEM audits.

Full overview

Client Profile

Industry Aerospace & Defence Manufacturing
Company Size Large Enterprise (1,200+ employees)
Geography Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Operational Context The client manufactures critical aluminum and titanium components for aerospace assemblies, including housings, brackets, and structural sub-parts. These components require non-destructive surface treatment with strict control over surface integrity, as fatigue life and visual inspection are key acceptance criteria for these components.

Business Challenge

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ client was dealing with typical issues that arise in the surface finishing process after CNC machining and heat treatment:

  • Surface Integrity Issues: It was found that the use of conventional angular abrasives caused micro-cutting, which increased the risk of stress risers in fatigue-sensitive parts.
  • Non-Uniform Cosmetic Finish: There were differences in the look of the product from batch to batch, hence it became very challenging to conduct quality inspections and customer ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌audits.
  • Dimensional Sensitivity: On the tightly tolerance aerospace components, even the slightest material removal was not allowed.
  • High Rejection Rates: About 6% of the parts were found defective due to surface non-conformities at the final inspection stage.
  • Audit Pressure: During aerospace OEM audits, there was a strong emphasis on the requirement for controlled, repeatable, and contamination-free blasting ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌processes.

Solution Implemented

After​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ a comprehensive application study and field trials under controlled conditions, we advised the change of blasting media from angular to Glass Beads.

Specific Solution:

  • Aerospace-grade spherical Glass Beads (sizes 150–250 microns) are ideal for both peening and cosmetic finishing.

Process Optimisation:

  • Blasting pressure was lowered to specify surface peening instead of surface erosion.
  • The nozzle distance and dwell time were adjusted to maintain the dimensional accuracy.
  • The media handling system was separated for ferrous abrasives to avoid their contamination.

Application Outcome:

  • Beautifully finished and aesthetically clean surfaces
  • Improvement of the surface compressive stress without loss of material
  • Visual clarity significantly improved for dye penetrant and visual ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌inspections

Implementation Process

Timeline: The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ entire process from qualification trials to mass production took 5 weeks.

Deployment Steps:

  • Week 1: Tests at the laboratory and company premises on aluminum and titanium sample parts.
  • Week 2: Inspection of surface roughness (Ra) and dimensions in reference to aerospace standards.
  • Week 3: Completion of blasting parameters and media grade approval.
  • Week 4: Production line turnover and machine adjustment.
  • Week 5: Process documentation for audit compliance and operator certification.

      Training: Operators and quality teams were thoroughly trained in aerospace blasting best practices and media cleanliness ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌protocols.

Results & Impact

Switching​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ to Glass Beads brought about significant changes:

  • Less​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ Rejections: Rejections due to finishing issues were reduced from 6% to below 0.8%.
  • Surface uniformity: A thoroughly smooth matte-to-satin type finish in all lots was ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌accomplished.
  • Dimensional Stability: There was no material wear detected even at the most critical features.
  • Inspection Efficiency: Having a clearer surface led to the saving of 20% inspection time.
  • Audit Compliance: Customer and regulatory audits were successfully passed by the new ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌process.

ROI & Business Benefits

  • Lower​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ Rework Costs: Less scrap and reprocessing led to a higher overall yield.
  • Extended Media Life: Glass beads had much less breakdown compared to angular abrasives.
  • Equipment Longevity: Wear to blast nozzles and liners was minimized.
  • Payback Period: About 11 months, mainly through quality improvements and fewer rejections.

Why the Client Chose This Company

The client partnered with us due to our:

  • Aerospace Application Know-How: Thorough understanding of fatigue-sensitive surface treatments.
  • Data-Driven Trials: Media and parameters were backed up by quantifiable test results.
  • Process Documentation Support: Help with standard operating procedures, validation records, and documentation for audits.
  • Consistent Abrasive Media Quality: Steady supply of high-purity glass beads that meet aerospace cleanliness ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌standards.

Ready to apply this approach to your line?

Tell us about your application, bead grade, and volume—our team will respond with specifications and commercial pricing within 24 hours.

WhatsApp Call
Call WhatsApp